Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.25 seconds)

Hyderabad Urban Development Authority ... vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 26 October, 2015

Similar view was also held subsequently by the Hon'ble ITAT, Amritsar Bench in the case of Jalandhar Development Authority v. Commissioner of Income-tax in IT appeal No. 562(ARS) 2008 on the basis of aforesaid decision. Here, it is very pertinent to quote hereunder the objects of the BDA as envisaged in Sec.7 of ODA Act'1982 which are pari materia to the objects as envisaged under section 28(1) of the Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995(PUDA); as under:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax-I Lucknow vs M/S Lucknow Development Authority ... on 16 September, 2013

5. He further submitted that the above order of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court was followed in the case of CIT vs. Lucknow Development Authority, 265 CTR (All) 433, wherein, it was held that "where the trust is carrying out its activities on non-commercial lines with no motive to earn profits, for fulfilment of its aims and objectives, which are charitable in nature and in the process earn some profits, the same would not be hit by proviso to section 2(15)."
Allahabad High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 44 - R Sharma - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax ... vs M/S Yamuna Expressway Industrial ... on 21 April, 2017

12. Ld D.R. has relied on the order of the CIT but could not show any good reason to not to follow the order of the Amritsar Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Improvement Trust Bathinda(supra) and Hon'ble Allahabad 11 ITA No. 329/CT K/ 2013 Bhubanes w ar De ve lop ment Autho ri t y High Court in the case of Lucknow Industrial Development (supra). Therefore, respectfully following the above decision, we set aside the order of the CIT and direct him to grant registration u/s.12AA of the Act.
Allahabad High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 5 - S Agarwal - Full Document
1   2 Next