Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)
Sucha Singh vs Jaswant Singh & Anr on 26 May, 2010 cites

Shri Arvindra Kumar Singh vs Smt. Hardayal Kaur And Ors. on 31 January, 2005

The document can be relevant at the time of leading evidence of possession, but it could not be read in evidence for forming a prima facie view, while deciding application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code. The judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Arvindra Kumar Singh Vs. Smt.Hardayal Kaur and Others (Supra) is also not relevant, as the question considered in that case was regarding rejection of the plaint.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 7 - P Nandrajog - Full Document

Balraj Singh vs Pritam Singh on 9 October, 2006

The fact also cannot be ignored, that attempt was also made to falsely implicate the mother and sister of the petitioner, in order to put pressure. The FIR was found to be false and cancellation report was submitted. The defendant/respondents also cannot take any benefit of judgments on which reliance was placed, as this court in the case of Balraj Singh Vs. Pritam Singh (supra) held that the document which is not in dispute can be seen for collateral performance, but endorsement was in dispute.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1   2 Next