Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (2.44 seconds)Section 16 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Co-Operative Societies Act, 1912
Andhra Pradesh Co-Operative Societies Act, 1964
Section 31 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
The Maharashtra Prohibition Act
Section 91 in The Maharashtra Prohibition Act [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Farkhundali Nannhay vs V.B. Potdar And Anr. on 18 August, 1961
Considering the similarity between S. 61 of the Act and S.
91 (1 of the Maharashtra Act 32 of 1961, we are of the
opinion that the interpretation already placed by this Court
on the provisions of S. 91 (I) of the Maharashtra Act 32 of
1961 is fully applicable to the provisions of S. 61 of the
Act with which we are concerned. Consequently, in deciding
these appeals, we must proceed on the basis that S. 61 of
the Act requires reference of a dispute to the Registrar
only if the dispute is capable of being resolved by the,
Registrar or his nominee, and, further, the dispute between
the co-operative society and the employee touches the
business of the society in the sense explained by this Court
in that case.