Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)

M/S.Gnc Infra Llp vs Assistant Commissioner (Circle) on 28 September, 2021

(iv) M/s. GNC Infra LLP v. Assistant Commissioner (Circle) [2021 (11) TMI 973 - Madras High Court] and, in particular, took me through the decision of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court of Judicature at Madras in the case of M/s. Cable Corporation of India Ltd. (supra) wherein, under similar circumstances, the Hon'ble High Court has held that for refund of security deposit, the provisions of Section 27 of the Customs Act would not apply.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 5 - M Sundar - Full Document

Commissioner Of Customs vs M/S. Aristo Spinners Pvt. Ltd on 25 January, 2008

Appeal. No(s).: C/40514 & 40515/2022-SM "4. The issues involved in the present case are squarely covered by the decision in the case of Commissioner of Customs, Chennai v. Aristo Spinners Ltd., 2008 (226) E.L.T. 42 (Mad.) = (2008) 4 TNLJ 517 decided by a Division Bench of this Court in which one of us (KRPJ) is a party, relying on the judgment of the Division Bench in which both of us are parties in the case of Commissioner of Customs (Exports) v. M/s. Jraj Exports (P) Ltd., 2007 (217) E.L.T. 504 (Mad.) = 2007 (3) TNLJ 532, wherein we have held that the bank guarantee cannot be regarded as equivalent to payment of duty and it is only furnished to safeguard the interest of the Revenue in case of non-
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 4 - K R Pandian - Full Document
1