Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.25 seconds)Additional Secretary To The Government ... vs Smt. Alka Subhash Gadia And Anr on 20 December, 1990
In view of
the case of Additional Secretary to the Government of India v. Alka
Subhash Gadia reported in 1992 Supp (1) SCC 496, it would be
appropriate to put strict conditions upon the petitioner. Thereby,
interim order which is in force since 03.12.2012 is extended for
further period for 15 days from today with the condition that
petitioner shall mark his presence before the nearest police station
on every third day without fail and petitioner shall disclose his
whereabouts and perfect address to the nearest police station within
two days. If petitioner fails to comply with any of such conditions,
such extension shall stand cancelled automatically without referring
to any authority. Direct Service is permitted. Rule is discharged.
Union Of India & Anr vs Shrimati Chaya Ghoshal & Anr on 13 December, 2004
In
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 428 between Union
of India v. Chaya Ghoshal, the Apex Court has while dealing
with the Law relating to Preventive Detention observed and held as
under:
Article 22 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Hare Ram Pandey vs State Of Bihar And Ors on 10 December, 2003
AIR 2004 SC 1625
between Union of India Vs. Amrit Lal Manchanda; AIR 2004 SC 738
between Hare Ram Pandey Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.;
Union Of India vs Amrit Lal Manchanda And Anr on 16 February, 2004
AIR 2004 SC 1625
between Union of India Vs. Amrit Lal Manchanda; AIR 2004 SC 738
between Hare Ram Pandey Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.;
State Of Tamil Nadu vs P.K. Shamsudeen on 21 July, 1992
AIR 1992 SC 1937
between State of Tamilnadu Vs. P.K. Shamsudeen;
Navalshankar Ishwarlal Dave And Anr vs State Of Gujarat And Ors on 12 May, 1993
AIR 1994 SC 1496
between Navalshankar Ishwarlal Dave Vs. State of Gujarat;
Union Of India & Ors vs Muneesh Suneja on 30 January, 2001
AIR 2001 SC 854
between Union of India Vs. Muneesh Suneja;
Subhash Popatlal Lunkad And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra on 9 October, 2018
It
is also clear that even in such case of Subhash
Popatlal Dave (Supra)
there are different views and therefore to enable the petitioner to
challenge the present order, it would be appropriate to continue the
interim order which would be in force for last couple of months.