Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 43 (0.49 seconds)Section 33 in The U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 [Entire Act]
Jt.Collector Ranga Reddy Dist.& ... vs D.Narsing Rao & Ors. Etc.Etc on 13 January, 2015
In Joint Collector Ranga Reddy Vs. D. Narsing Rao, (2015) 3 SCC 695, it has been held that even if no limitation has been provided, the order is required to be challenged within reasonable time.
State Of Kerala vs M.K. Kunhikannan Nambiar ... on 4 December, 1995
Judgments of Supreme Court in State of Kerala Vs. M.K. Kunhikannan Manbiar Manjeri Mannikoti Nanduvi, (1996) 1 SCC 435, Sultan Sadik Vs. Sanjay Raj Subba, (2004) 4 SCC 377, Nagappan Vs. Ammasai Gounder, (2004) 13 SCC 450, M. Minakshi Vs. Metadin Agrawal, (2006) 7 SCC 470, Sneh Gupta Vs. Devi Swarup, (2009) 6 SCC 194 and Krishnadevi Malchand Kamathia Vs. Bombay Enviromental Action Group, (2011) 3 SCC 363, in which it has been held that a void order, if not set aside in proper forum, it cannot be ignored in collateral proceeding.
Sultan Sadik vs Sanjay Raj Subba And Ors on 5 January, 2004
Judgments of Supreme Court in State of Kerala Vs. M.K. Kunhikannan Manbiar Manjeri Mannikoti Nanduvi, (1996) 1 SCC 435, Sultan Sadik Vs. Sanjay Raj Subba, (2004) 4 SCC 377, Nagappan Vs. Ammasai Gounder, (2004) 13 SCC 450, M. Minakshi Vs. Metadin Agrawal, (2006) 7 SCC 470, Sneh Gupta Vs. Devi Swarup, (2009) 6 SCC 194 and Krishnadevi Malchand Kamathia Vs. Bombay Enviromental Action Group, (2011) 3 SCC 363, in which it has been held that a void order, if not set aside in proper forum, it cannot be ignored in collateral proceeding.
M. Meenakshi & Ors vs Metadin Agarwal (D) By Lrs. & Ors on 29 August, 2006
Judgments of Supreme Court in State of Kerala Vs. M.K. Kunhikannan Manbiar Manjeri Mannikoti Nanduvi, (1996) 1 SCC 435, Sultan Sadik Vs. Sanjay Raj Subba, (2004) 4 SCC 377, Nagappan Vs. Ammasai Gounder, (2004) 13 SCC 450, M. Minakshi Vs. Metadin Agrawal, (2006) 7 SCC 470, Sneh Gupta Vs. Devi Swarup, (2009) 6 SCC 194 and Krishnadevi Malchand Kamathia Vs. Bombay Enviromental Action Group, (2011) 3 SCC 363, in which it has been held that a void order, if not set aside in proper forum, it cannot be ignored in collateral proceeding.
Sneh Gupta vs Devi Sarup & Ors on 17 February, 2009
Judgments of Supreme Court in State of Kerala Vs. M.K. Kunhikannan Manbiar Manjeri Mannikoti Nanduvi, (1996) 1 SCC 435, Sultan Sadik Vs. Sanjay Raj Subba, (2004) 4 SCC 377, Nagappan Vs. Ammasai Gounder, (2004) 13 SCC 450, M. Minakshi Vs. Metadin Agrawal, (2006) 7 SCC 470, Sneh Gupta Vs. Devi Swarup, (2009) 6 SCC 194 and Krishnadevi Malchand Kamathia Vs. Bombay Enviromental Action Group, (2011) 3 SCC 363, in which it has been held that a void order, if not set aside in proper forum, it cannot be ignored in collateral proceeding.
Krishnadevi Malchand Kamathia & Ors vs Bombay Enviornmental Action Group.& ... on 31 January, 2011
Judgments of Supreme Court in State of Kerala Vs. M.K. Kunhikannan Manbiar Manjeri Mannikoti Nanduvi, (1996) 1 SCC 435, Sultan Sadik Vs. Sanjay Raj Subba, (2004) 4 SCC 377, Nagappan Vs. Ammasai Gounder, (2004) 13 SCC 450, M. Minakshi Vs. Metadin Agrawal, (2006) 7 SCC 470, Sneh Gupta Vs. Devi Swarup, (2009) 6 SCC 194 and Krishnadevi Malchand Kamathia Vs. Bombay Enviromental Action Group, (2011) 3 SCC 363, in which it has been held that a void order, if not set aside in proper forum, it cannot be ignored in collateral proceeding.
State Of H.P vs Narain Singh on 8 July, 2009
State of Himanchal Pradesh Vs. Narain Singh, (2009) 13 SCC 115 and Rajendra Shankar Shukla Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, AIR 2015 SC 3147, in which it has been held that legislature is competent to make law retrospectively and validate the action which was otherwise without jurisdiction.