Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.86 seconds)

Union Bank Of India vs Sushila Goela And Ors. on 7 November, 2005

36 In the case of Union Bank of India...Vs... Sushila Goela & others, 125 (2005) Delhi Law Times, 161 itwas heldthat where the tenancyhas expiredby efflux oftimeeven no noticeisnecessaryand wherethedefendant has notdisputed receipt ofnotice and has admitted documentsduringadmission/denial, judgmentcanbe passedunderOrder 12 Rule 6 CPC whichbecome applicable and thereisno questionof holding over.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 19 - M Katju - Full Document
1