Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)Section 7 in The M.P. Public Trusts Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The M.P. Public Trusts Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Indian Trusts Act, 1882
Hasan Nurani Malak vs Assistant Charity Commissioner, ... on 22 August, 1966
16.In view of aforesaid discussion, in light of Section 8 of the Act of 1951
and the principles of law laid down by the Supreme Court in Hasan
Nurani Malak (supra) and Seth Chand Ratan (supra), I am of the
considered opinion that the writ petition as framed and filed against
the finding of the Registrar, Public Trusts would not be maintainable
and the petitioner's remedy would be to file civil suit under Section 8
of the Act of 1951 to establish his right.
Seth Chand Ratan vs Pandit Durga Prasad (D) By Lrs. & Ors on 28 March, 2003
16.In view of aforesaid discussion, in light of Section 8 of the Act of 1951
and the principles of law laid down by the Supreme Court in Hasan
Nurani Malak (supra) and Seth Chand Ratan (supra), I am of the
considered opinion that the writ petition as framed and filed against
the finding of the Registrar, Public Trusts would not be maintainable
and the petitioner's remedy would be to file civil suit under Section 8
of the Act of 1951 to establish his right.
Whirlpool Corporation vs Registrar Of Trade Marks, Mumbai & Ors on 26 October, 1998
15.It is true that in Whirlpool Corporation (supra), the Supreme Court
has held that the alternative remedy shall not operate as a bar in at
least three contingencies, namely, where the writ petition has been
filed for enforcement of any of the Fundamental Rights or where there
has been a violation of the principle of natural justice or where the
order of proceedings are wholly without jurisdiction or the vires of an
Act is challenged. None of the circumstances is shown to be present
in the instant case.
Section 4 in The M.P. Public Trusts Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
1