Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)Article 311 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 124 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Management Of The Express ... vs The Presiding Officer,Labour Court, ... on 18 December, 1963
The decision of the Apex Court as relied upon the appellant in the case of the Management of the Express Newspapers (Pvt.) Ltd., Madurai v. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Madurai and Anr. (supra), in our view, would not be applicable to the facts of the present case. In the said case even after expiry of the period of probation, the service of the employee concerned was neither terminated nor confirmed. That apart, there was clear stigma in the letter of termination. In that background, it was held that an employer had no right to terminate the services of the employee before the period of probation had expired except on the ground of misconduct or for sufficient reasons in which case even the services of a permanent employee can be terminated.
Shamsher Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 23 August, 1974
10. Apart from the facts of the present case, there are number of decisions of the Supreme Court, namely, Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab and Anr. (supra).
Oil And Natural Gas Commission And Ors vs Dr. Mohd. S. Iskender Ali on 14 April, 1980
Oil and Natural Gas Commission and Ors. v. Dr. Md. S. Iskander Ali (supra), and Union of India v. Arun Kumar Roy, AIR 1986 SC 737 : 1986 (1) SCC 675 : where services of the employee concerned were terminated during the period of probation since their performance was not satisfactory.
Union Of India And Ors vs Arun Kumar Roy on 23 January, 1986
Oil and Natural Gas Commission and Ors. v. Dr. Md. S. Iskander Ali (supra), and Union of India v. Arun Kumar Roy, AIR 1986 SC 737 : 1986 (1) SCC 675 : where services of the employee concerned were terminated during the period of probation since their performance was not satisfactory.
Commodore Commanding, Southern Naval ... vs V.K. Rajan on 10 March, 1981
8. Keeping in mind the above, a reference can be made to different decisions of the Apex Court in the cases of Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab and Anr., AIR 1974 SC 2192 : 1974 (2) SCC 831 : 1974-II-LLJ-465 : Oil and Natural Gas Commission and Ors. v. Dr. Md. S. IskanderAli, 1980 SC 1242 : 1980 (3) SCC 428 : 1980-n-LLJ-155 Commodore Commanding Southern Naval Area, Cochin v. V.N. Rajan, AIR 1981 SC 965 ; 1981 (2) SCC 636 : 1981-II-LLJ-1 : and Union of India and Ors. v. Chander Pal, AIR 1987 SC 1334 : 1987 (Supp.) SCC 41. From a bare perusal of the abovementioned decisions, it would appear the law relating to appointment on probation is well-settled. An employee who gets appointment on probation continued to be on probation. Period of probation is to judge the performance of such an employee.
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Chander Pal on 20 January, 1987
8. Keeping in mind the above, a reference can be made to different decisions of the Apex Court in the cases of Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab and Anr., AIR 1974 SC 2192 : 1974 (2) SCC 831 : 1974-II-LLJ-465 : Oil and Natural Gas Commission and Ors. v. Dr. Md. S. IskanderAli, 1980 SC 1242 : 1980 (3) SCC 428 : 1980-n-LLJ-155 Commodore Commanding Southern Naval Area, Cochin v. V.N. Rajan, AIR 1981 SC 965 ; 1981 (2) SCC 636 : 1981-II-LLJ-1 : and Union of India and Ors. v. Chander Pal, AIR 1987 SC 1334 : 1987 (Supp.) SCC 41. From a bare perusal of the abovementioned decisions, it would appear the law relating to appointment on probation is well-settled. An employee who gets appointment on probation continued to be on probation. Period of probation is to judge the performance of such an employee.
1