Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)Mukhtiar Singh vs Ajit & Another on 17 January, 2011
It is proved on record that two Wills dated
18.5.2007 and dated 15.1.2008 were in dispute in civil suit
No. 16 of 2008 titled Mukhtiar Singh Vs Ajit Singh. It is
proved on record that Civil Judge did not dispose of civil suit
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 21:34:26 :::HCHP
6
No. 16 of 2008 on merits but civil suit No. 16 of 2008 was
.
The Registration Act, 1908
Section 77 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 35A in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 59 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 63 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Inacio Martins Deceased Through Lrs vs Narayan Hari Naik And Ors on 7 April, 1993
dismissed in default. It is also proved on record that learned
District Judge did not dismiss civil appeal No. 47 of 2008 on
merits but dismissed the appeal in default. It is held that
when civil suit is dismissed in default then provision of
of
resjudicata would not apply in subsequent civil suit when
subsequent civil suit is filed upon different cause of action
and title. See AIR 1993 SC 1756 Inacio Martins Vs. Narayan
rt
Hari Naik.