Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.33 seconds)Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Rajendra Shantaram Todankar vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 7 January, 2003
28. Appellant Vrindavan has been rightly convicted under Section 302 IPC. The other accused persons have been rightly convicted under Section 302/149 IPC because after Vrindavan caused injury by axe on the head of the deceased all the other appellants caused injuries by lathis and thereafter they dragged the deceased inside the house of Vrindavan and bolted it from inside and there also they dealt the blows. Thus the act of other appellants would come under the ambit and sweep of Section 149 IPC. The decisions of Rajendra Shantaram Todankar (supra) and Sarman (supra) are not applicable in the present facts and circumstances because in the case of Rajendra Shantaram Todankar (supra) some of the accused persons did not cause injury to the decease. But in the present case all the appellants caused injury to the deceased.
Section 33 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Molu And Ors. vs State Of Haryana on 23 August, 1976
27. The decision of Molu (supra) is not applicable in the present case because in that case the injuries were caused by lathis and were minor in character and they were not on the vital part of the body. The injury which was found on the scalp was superficial.
1