Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)
Rizwan Warsi And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 8 December, 2020 cites

Amrawati Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru Collector Sultanpur ... on 16 July, 2019

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that in the fitness of circumstances, this application stands disposed of with the direction that the court below would extend the benefit of interim bail (if the court concerned deems it fit according to the merit of each case) as contemplated in the law laid down by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. after the applicant surrenders within 45 days before the court and if his bail application is filed, the same shall be adjudicated and decided by the courts below with speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, in the light of the judgment given by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hussain and another Vs. Union of India reported in (2017) 5 SCC Page-702, relevant extract of which reads as under :-
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 10534 - Full Document

Hussain And Anr vs Union Of India on 9 March, 2017

In the aforesaid backdrop, learned Sessions Judge/the concerned Trial Judge is directed to ensure that the guidelines given in the case of Hussain and another (supra) as well as in Brahm Singh and others (Supra) has to be carried out in its letter and spirit, failing which an adverse inference would be drawn against the erring officers and this Court would be compelled to take appropriate action against them, if found that there is laxity in adhering the above directions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 2331 - A K Goel - Full Document

Brahm Singh And Ors., Etc. vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 14 March, 1972

In the aforesaid backdrop, learned Sessions Judge/the concerned Trial Judge is directed to ensure that the guidelines given in the case of Hussain and another (supra) as well as in Brahm Singh and others (Supra) has to be carried out in its letter and spirit, failing which an adverse inference would be drawn against the erring officers and this Court would be compelled to take appropriate action against them, if found that there is laxity in adhering the above directions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 2297 - A N Grover - Full Document
1