Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
Sushila Devi vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi Through on 13 March, 2013
The respondents in the impugned orders have neither
considered their own circular dated 23.07.1997 nor have dealt with
the defence of the applicant that he could not join the duty on
account of the reasons beyond his control. In this background, we
are of the considered view that the respondents have passed the
impugned orders not only in violation of their own policy decision as
contained in their circular dated 23.07.1997 but also in a mechanical
manner. A few judgments, of course, have been quoted in the
counter reply filed by the respondents, however, the same have
12
OA No. 1217/2020
Item No.28/C-2
neither been argued nor do we find applicable in the facts and
circumstances of the present case. Moreover, nothing has been
brought on record or shown to us that the judgment of this Tribunal
in Sushila Devi (supra) is not applicable in the present case.
1