Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.56 seconds)Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 320 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Dharambir Singh Through L.Rs. And ... vs State Of Haryana And Others on 21 April, 2010
Report as well as the statements of the parties perused. It is
clear from these documents that the petitioners and respondent no. 2 have
resolved their differences by a bonafide compromise free from any fraud,
coercion or undue influence. A compromise would help the parties to live
their lives, without illwill or rancour and contribute to harmony and peace in
the society. Dealing with issue of quashing of FIR on the basis of
compromise, a Bench consisting of five Hon'ble Judges of this Court in
Kulwinder Singh's case (supra) while approving minority view in
Dharambir v. State of Haryana, 2005(2) Law Herald (P&H) (FB) 723,
opined as under:-
Kulwinder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 5 December, 2006
Keeping in view the enunciation of law as referred to above
and applying the same to the facts and circumstances of the present case,
once the matter has been compromised between the parties, no useful
purpose will be served by proceeding with the prosecution. Accordingly,
FIR No. 150 dated 4.11.2009, registered under Sections 379, 120-B IPC and
Section 16 of the Cable Television Network Registration Act, 1995, at
Police Station Division No. 1, Jalandhar, and all subsequent proceedings
arising therefrom are quashed.
1