Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.23 seconds)
K.Chinnaiah vs The District Collector on 13 September, 2023 cites

Signature Not Verified Digitally ... vs Mr. Puneet Saini, Adv. For Petitioner In ... on 31 August, 2022

6.Whereas, this Court in S.M. Hajabakrutheen Vs. The Inspector General of Registration [W.P.(MD) Nos. 14546 of 2022 batch, dated 27.03.2023], in view of the conflicting views taken by two different benches of this Court regarding the applicability of Section 77A, has referred various issues for consideration by a Larger Bench of this Court. The relevant portion of the reference order is extracted as follows-
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 881 - V Bakhru - Full Document

Satya Pal Anand vs State Of M.P. And Ors on 26 October, 2016

5. Patta still stands in the name of the petitioner. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Satya Pal Anand v. State of M.P., [(2016) 10 SCC 767] has held that that the power to cancel the registration is a substantive matter and in the absence of any express provision on that behalf, it is not open to assume that the Registering Officer would be competent to cancel the registration of the 3/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.22383 of 2023 documents in question. Therefore, for cancellation of registered documents, the State of Tamil Nadu brought an amendment to the Registration Act, vide the Registration (Tamil Nadu Second Amendment) Act, 2021. By this amendment Act, Sections 22B, 77A, 77B, 81A and 81B were inserted in the Registration Act. Section 77A provides the power to the Registrar to cancel registered documents, if it is found to be in contravention of sections 22A and 22B.
Supreme Court of India Cites 51 - Cited by 92 - A M Khanwilkar - Full Document
1