Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.29 seconds)Dena Bank vs Kiritikumar T.Patel on 19 November, 1997
According to him, hence, it is imperative that the aforesaid
burden on the workmen is duly and properly discharged, in
support, Mr. Talsania places reliance on Dena Bank Vs.
Kiritkumar T. Patel13. Mr. Talsania was at pains to point
out that the workmen have failed to discharge the burden
under Section 17-B of the said Act for the following
reasons :-
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
U.P. State Bridge Corporation Limited vs Maharashtra General Kamgar Union on 17 January, 2008
"3. A Division Bench of this Court presided over by the
learned Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Swatanter
Kumar has in a recent judgment delivered on 17th
January, 2008 in (U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd.
vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union), L.P.A. 290 of
2007 reported in 2008 (2) Bom.C.R. 619, and
connected matters dealt extensively with the law on
the subject. The Division Bench has referred to the
judgments of the Supreme Court which hold the field.
The principle which has been laid down by the Division
Mrs.Kiran Uppal Prop. M/S Clas vs Ashok Kumar & Ors. on 16 May, 2012
(5) Mrs. Kiran Uppal Prop. M/s. Clas Vs. Ashok
2 (1999) 9 SCC 229
3 1997 (2) GUJLH 946, AIR 1998 SC 511
4 Appeal (Civil) No.3731 of 2021
5 2004 (72) DRJ 297, Del HC 2003
M/S Control Print Limited vs Ajitpal Singh Rana on 8 January, 2019
North East Karnataka Road Transport ... vs M.Nagangouda on 9 January, 2007
Workmen Represented By Hindustan V.O. ... vs Hindustan Vegetable Oils Corporation ... on 10 April, 2000
4. Due to paucity of time, the Writ Petitions could not be
heard finally on the assigned dates. Since these are
applications under Section 17-B of the said Act, the same
needs to be heard expeditiously. Mr. Talsania, learned senior
advocate, made an effort to persuade me to take up the
writ petitions itself for final hearing. A full-fledged hearing
may not be possible for the present and therefore I proceed
to decide the interim applications. I have to be cognisant of
the observations made by the Supreme Court in the case of
Workmen Represented By Hindustan vs. Hindustan