Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.32 seconds)
Vuppuluri Atchayya And Ors., Voppuluri ... vs Kanchumarti Venkata Seetarama Chandra ... on 28 November, 1912 cites

Dwarka Nath Sen vs Kisori Lal Gosain And Anr. on 11 February, 1910

9. In the revision petitions before us, the Subordinate Judge could not be said to have had no jurisdiction to hear appeals against the Munsif's orders returning the plaints for presentation to the proper Court. Assuming that his decision on the interpretation of the saving clause to Section 153 of the Estates Land Act is erroneous, he could not be said to have acted illegally or with material irregularity in the exercise of his jurisdiction though he might have decided erroneously, the question of law. However, as was said in Dwarka Nath Sen v. Kishori Lal Gosain 14 C.W.N. 703; 11 C.L.J. 426; 6 Ind. Cas.
Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Khatija Bi And Ors. vs Babu Sahib And Ors. on 21 March, 1912

In Khatija Bi v. Babu Sahib 14 Ind. Cas. 544; 15 M.L.T. 409 which was decided by Benson, J. and myself, we held that where the first Court, owing to an error of law, failed to exercise a jurisdiction vested in it and the Appellate Court taking the same view of the law confirmed the order, the Appellate Court must also be held to have failed to exercise a jurisdiction vested in it. But the point was not examined at length in the judgment.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 Next