Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.35 seconds)
Rfa No.124/2 vs Land Acquisition Collector And Others on 1 August, 2016 cites

Kuldeep Singh And Others vs Subeg Singh And Others --Respondents on 11 March, 2014

versus Sehaj Ram ...Respondent. ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:55:43 :::HCHP ...2... 6. RFA No.109/2010 Land Acquisition Collector ....Appellant. versus . Durga Dass and others ...Respondents. 7. RFA No.111/2010 Land Acquisition Collector and others ....Appellants. versus Sant Ram and others ...Respondents. of 8. RFA No.112/2010 Land Acquisition Collector and others ....Appellants. rt Kuldeep Kumar and others versus ...Respondents. 9. RFA No.113/2010 Land Acquisition Collector and others ....Appellants. versus Shiv Ram and others ...Respondents. 10. RFA No.126/2010 Desh Raj ....Appellant. versus
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 11 - R K Jain - Full Document

Union Of India vs Harinder Pal Singh & Ors on 26 October, 2005

18. Also, the judgment was subsequently referred to and relied upon by this Court in Executive Engineer & Anr. vs. Dilla Ram {Latest HLJ 2008 HP 1007} and relying upon the decision of the Apex Court in Harinder Pal Singh of (supra), wherein the market value of the land under acquisition situated in five different villages was assessed rt uniformly irrespective of its nature and quality, also awarded compensation on uniform rates.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 715 - A Kabir - Full Document

Himachal Pradesh Housing & vs M/S Kundan Lal Hari Ram & Company on 15 March, 2016

This Court, in Gulabi and etc. vs. State of H.P., AIR 1998 HP 9, where the land was acquired for the purpose of construction of National Highway-21, held that the claimants would be entitled to compensation uniformly for all classes of land irrespective of its classification or quality. This principle came to be followed and accepted by this Court in H.P. Housing Board vs. Ram Lal & Ors. 2003(3), Shim. L. C. 64, wherein the land was acquired for the purposes of setting up of a Housing Colony by the respondent authority itself. The Court held that:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 311 - S Karol - Full Document

The Land Acquisition Officer Revenue ... vs Smt. L. Kamalamma (Deed) By Trs. & Ors., ... on 19 January, 1998

28. Faced with this situation, Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, on behalf of Housing Board submitted, that it is matter of common knowledge that plots situated on the roadside carry higher price, as compared to the plots which are away from the road. This argument cannot be accepted in view of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in the case of Land Acquisition Officer Revenue Divisional Officer, Chittor v. L. Kamlamma (Smt.) Dead by LRs and ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:55:43 :::HCHP ...11...
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 412 - Full Document
1   2 Next