Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)Taran Singh Hazari vs Ramratan Tewari on 26 May, 1903
5. Counsel for the defendants contends that a reading of the Will as a whole would indicate that the intention of the testator could only have been that the A schedule properties should be surrendered to the plaintiff on his attaining majority and that B schedule properties were to be taken absolutely by defendants 1 and 2, in equal moieties, after the death of Aley. It has been repeatedly laid down that in interpreting a Will regard must always be had not merely la the words used but to the evident intention of the testator. See Taran Singh Hazari v. Ramratan Tewari ILR 31 Cal 89. But the proposition is also equally clear that in order to understand the intention of the testator, primarily the words of the Will are to be considered.
P. Krishna Bhatta vs Narayana Bhatta And Ors. on 7 October, 1961
One other consideration in the circumstances is as observed in Krishna Bhatia v. Narayana Bhatta 1962 Ker LJ 149 : (AIR 1962 Kerala 322) by a Bench of this Court.
1