Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.21 seconds)S.R Bhanrale vs Union Of India And Others on 19 July, 1996
Date: 2025.09.25 11:59:23+05'30'
Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2024.3.0
13 OA No. 914/2022
the same in the year 2022. In the application for
condonation of delay, he states that the applicant is not
well trained in administrative matters and was not fully
aware of his entitlement and since his health was not good
from 09th February, 2009 and from 25th March, 2020 due
to Covid Pandemic, he could not pursue the case. He had
made a detailed representation on 04th September, 2021.
This shows that the applicant has committed delay of 12
years. The cause of action arose in the year 2010 when
gratuity was paid to the applicant but pension was not
granted. Thus, there is delay of 11 years. The applicant has
placed reliance on the case of S.R. Bhanrale (supra), in
which it is held that if the government is at fault, the
government should not raise question of limitation.
Chhaya Bhattacharya (Roy) vs The State Of West Bengal & Others on 8 September, 2015
25. This judgement of Supreme Court is not applicable to
the facts of the case at hand. In that case before the
Supreme Court, unauthorized absence was treated as
extraordinary leave. The respondents had failed to conduct
inquiry as per Tribunal's order. No inquiry was held by the
respondents for denying the pension. In the case at hand,
the applicant was served with the chargesheet for
unauthorized absence and his increment was stopped in
the year 2004. Since there was no improvement, another
chargesheet was served on him in which he was found
guilty and he was compulsorily retired. Therefore, the
judgment in the case of Jaya Bhattacharya (supra) has no
application to the facts of the case at hand.
Digitally signed by Nicky Kumari
DN: C=IN, O=Personal, OID.2.5.4.65=5701472963214eacaf7214eb1c705990,
Phone=
319c15ca9eb1feefdf068e6ccd39ee2956895f6f91a3b405297e23829af5a475,
Nicky Kumari PostalCode=823002, S=Bihar, SERIALNUMBER=
78a0e5fc01b6b3d12eabec40e7f8c4bf366c1f4f6f5bd93fc66bbdd397444faa, CN=
Nicky Kumari
Reason: I am the author of this document
Location:
Simer Singh vs Union Of India And Others on 11 May, 2022
The applicant in
Digitally signed by Nicky Kumari
the case of Simer Singh (supra) was aggrieved by the
DN: C=IN, O=Personal, OID.2.5.4.65=5701472963214eacaf7214eb1c705990,
Phone=
319c15ca9eb1feefdf068e6ccd39ee2956895f6f91a3b405297e23829af5a475,
Nicky Kumari PostalCode=823002, S=Bihar, SERIALNUMBER=
78a0e5fc01b6b3d12eabec40e7f8c4bf366c1f4f6f5bd93fc66bbdd397444faa, CN=
Nicky Kumari
Reason: I am the author of this document
Location:
1