Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.32 seconds)
Dr.B.Laila vs State Of Kerala cites

Tejshree Ghag Etc. Etc vs Prakash Parashuram Patil & Ors. Etc. Etc on 17 May, 2007

29. But the moot question is whether the contention by the respondents that the guidelines now adopted will not affect the doctors working as Associate Professors/Additional Professors when they are grouped along with Assistant Professors, is justified. As held by the Apex Court in Tejshree Ghag's case {(2007) 6 SCC 220} it can be said that transfers must be made to an equivalent post. By no stretch of imagination it can be seen that the post of Assistant Professor and Associate Professor/Additional Professor will be equivalent even under the Career wpc 5237/2011, etc. 19 Advancement Scheme. When a person goes up in the ladder, it will confer higher pay and higher responsibilities. It depends upon various factors including teaching experience, qualification, etc., as already seen from Ext.P8.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 43 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Vice-Chancellor, L.N. Mithila ... vs Dayanand Jha on 25 April, 1986

In Vice Chancellor L.N. Mithila University v. Dayanand Jha {(1986) 3 SCC 7}, the question considered was whether a transfer should be made to a post which is not equivalent. Therein, after considering various arguments regarding the challenge against transfer from the post of Principal to the post of Reader, the Apex Court held that "the true criterion for equivalence is the status and the nature and responsibility of the duties attached to the two posts." The above view is projected by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, in support of the arguments.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 92 - Full Document
1