Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.25 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 17 in The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 [Entire Act]
Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd. vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, ... on 2 September, 1993
6.The Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court, in the case
of Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs. Regional Provident Fund
5/16
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.No.23967 of 2017
Commissioner, held on 07.08.1984 as follows:
Section 32A in The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 [Entire Act]
Organo Chemical Industries & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 23 July, 1979
7.The learned counsel for the petitioner cited the judgment in
the case of Organo Chemical Industries vs. Union of India
reported in (1979) 4 Supreme Court Cases 573. Mr.V.R.Krishna
Iyer and A.P.Sen,JJ while speaking for the Bench made an observation
as follows:
Section 14 in The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 [Entire Act]
M/S. Lakshmi Machine Works Limited, ... vs M/S. L.M.W. Workers Union, Coimbatore on 20 January, 1997
5.The learned counsel for the petitioner cited a judgment of the
Madras High Court in the case of M/s.Lakshmi Machine Works
Limited, Coimbatore vs. Union of India, rep.by its Central
Provident Fund Commissioner, HUDCO, New Delhi and others,
dated 08.09.2011 wherein the High Court made an observation as
follows:
1