State & Ors vs Devendra Kumar & Ors on 7 December, 2010
23) Lastly, it also assumes relevance that no
FIR No. 273/2019, PS Burari Page No. 13 of 14
State Vs. Rajesh Kumar & Anr.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.26 seconds)Section 33 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 38 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Hem Raj & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 29 March, 2005
None of the PWs have stated about any effort that was
made to join the public persons in the investigation or
reasons why the same was not done. Ergo, it can be said
that public witnesses were admittedly not joined in
investigation. Taking a pause here, I find it relevant to note
the judgment of Hem Raj v. State of Haryana AIR 2005 SC
FIR No. 273/2019, PS Burari Page No. 11 of 14
State Vs. Rajesh Kumar & Anr.