Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)
Jahan Ara Bibi And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 16 April, 2019 cites

Vijayander Kumar & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 11 February, 2014

"10. Contra the submission advanced on behalf of the appellants, the learned counsel for respondent 2 has submitted that there is no merit in the contention advanced on behalf of the appellants Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47729 of 2014 dt.16-04-2019 5/6 that the FIR discloses only a civil case or that there is no allegation or averment making out a criminal offence. For that purpose he relied upon the judgment of the High Court rendered in the facts of this very case Vijayander Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, already noted earlier.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 170 - S K Singh - Full Document

Ravindra Kumar Madhanlal Goenka & Anr vs M/S Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners P. Ltd on 13 April, 2009

12. The learned counsel for the respondents is correct in contending that a given set of facts may make out a civil wrong as also a criminal offence and only because a civil remedy may also be available to the informant/complainant that itself cannot be a ground to quash a criminal proceeding. The real test is whether the allegations in the complaint disclose a criminal offence or not. This proposition is supported by several judgments of this Court as noted in para 16 of the judgment in Ravindra Kumar Madhanlal Goenka v. Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners (P) Ltd."
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 149 - M Sharma - Full Document
1