Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.35 seconds)
City Corporation Of Trivandrum vs V.P.N. Arunachalam Reddiar And Anr. on 28 March, 1960 cites

Jiwan Das vs Rabin Sen And Ors. on 7 March, 1955

Necessarily it follows that the sanction must be for the prosecution of specified individuals and for specific offences. These conditions are not satisfied by Ext. P4 which makes no reference to any specified individuals to be prosecuted or to any specific offence for which the prosecution has to be launched. The conferring of an authority or the giving of sanction in such vague and general terms is not what is required under Section 20, A similar question arose for consideration in Jiwan Das v. Rabin Sen, AIR 1956 Cal 64. There it was the question of a sanction under Section 34 of the Industrial Disputes Act. In that case the following observations were made about the test to be satisfied before the sanction could be accepted as a proper and valid one :
Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 8 - K C Gupta - Full Document
1   2 Next