Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 (0.27 seconds)
Appala Ganesh Chakravarthy vs State Of Telangana on 8 January, 2020 cites

Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977

(5) The observations made in Harnek Singh v. Charanjit Singh (supra) have to be read in the light of the law laid down by the Constitution Benches in N.P. Ponnuswami v.Returning Officer, Namakkal Constitutency, Durga Shankar Mehta v. Raghuraj Singh,Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner (supra) and by three Judges Bench in Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 56 - Cited by 4221 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Lakshmi Charan Sen And Ors Etc vs A.K.M. Hassan Uzzaman And Ors. Etc on 8 May, 1985

"a. validity of laws relating to delimitation and allotment of seats made under Article 243-ZA cannot be questioned in any court. No election to a municipality can be questioned except by an election petition. Moreover, it is well settled by now that if the election is imminent or well under way, the court should not intervene to stop the election process. If this is allowed to be done, no election will ever take place because someone or the other will always find some excuse to move the court and stall the elections. [para 12] b. But the principles laid down in Lakshmi Charan Sen case[(1985) 4 SCC 689] will apply in full force to municipal elections because various articles dealing with holding of municipal elections in Part IX- A of the Constitution are similarly worded. In fact, highest importance has been attached to holding of panchayat as well as municipal elections by the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 343 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document

State Of U.P. & Ors.Etc vs Pradhan Sangh Kshettra Samiti & Ors. Etc on 24 March, 1995

(ii) The proposition contained in clause (i) above is subject to the condition that challenge to the delimitation may be entertained in exceptional cases where no objections were invited and no hearing was given provided that such challenge is made before issue of notification for holding election. {State of UP. v. Pradhan Sangh Kshetra Samiti(supra))
Supreme Court of India Cites 56 - Cited by 558 - P B Sawant - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next