Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 44 (0.25 seconds)Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Madhya Pradesh Industries Ltd vs Union Of India And Others on 16 August, 1965
Whether the opportunity to show cause should be by written representation or by personal hearing depends on the facts of each case and ordinarily it will be in the discretion of the tribunal or authority passing the final order: M. P. Industries v. Union of India (AIR 1966 SC 671). It was, therefore, open to the Government in the exercise of its discretion to refuse the request of the Corporation for an oral hearing."
The Army Act, 1950
Section 165 in The Army Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Army Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Bhagat Raja vs The Union Of India & Ors on 29 March, 1967
24. Bhagat Raja v. Union of India, AIR 1967 SC 1606 is another decision of the Supreme Court and is also a decision of a Bench of five Judges in which it was Observed:--
Som Datt Datta vs Union Of India And Ors on 20 September, 1968
It appears, therefore, that the decision in Som Dales case (AIR 1969 SC 414) was very much concerned with the provisions in the Army Act and in view of this, even if this Court chooses to follow the decision of a larger Bench, there is no reason why it should not follow Bhagat Raja's case (AIR 1967 SC 1606).
Travancore Rayon Ltd vs Union Of India on 28 October, 1969
In Travancore Rayons v. Union of India, AIR 1971 SC 862, it was observed: