Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.27 seconds)Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977
14. It is apparent from the above narration that the University embarked
upon an exercise to try and justify the impugned order by supporting the
same by reasons which were not in contemplation while passing the
impugned order. The impugned order was passed on the basis of the
recommendation of the concerned Committee pursuant to its meeting held
on 17.11.2014. Therefore, the University's decision to shift the students
must be examined on the basis of the reasons as indicated in the minutes of
the said meeting held on 17.11.2014 and it is not open for the University to
now provide other reasons to justify the impugned order (see Mohinder
Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commr.: (1978) 1 SCC 405)
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Haryana vs Global Educational & Social Trust & Ors on 27 August, 2012
The petitioners relied upon the observations made by a Division Bench of
this court in LPA No. 756/2011 captioned as 'State of Haryana v. Global
Educational & Social Trust & Ors.'
3.5 That the reasons recorded by the Committee in its minutes dated
17.11.2014 for rejecting the proposal of Maharaja Agrasen Institute of
Technology, New Delhi was contrary to the letter dated 14.10.2014 written
by the said Institute to the University for accommodating all students even
if the students may not be in a position to pay the fee to the said institute for
that session.
Section 4 in The National Capital Region Planning Board Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The National Capital Region Planning Board Act, 1985
Article 4 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1