Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (2.90 seconds)
Sukhwinder Singh Gill vs Punjab Housing Development Board on 7 March, 2026 cites

Durgabai Deshmukh Memorial Senior Sec. ... vs J.A.J. Vasu Sena on 21 August, 2019

11. The he Hon'ble Supreme Court in Durgabai Deshmukh Memorial Sr. Sec. School and another v. J.A.J. Vasu Sena and another, 2019(4) SCT 346, 346, while dealing with a similar issue has held that continuation of services beyond period of probation does not 7 of 16 ::: Downloaded on - 10-03-2026 01:55:22 ::: 8 RSA-903 of 1990 (O&M) amount to deemed deemed confirmation of service unless issuance of order oof confirmation by appointing authority. In the said judgment, it has been held as under: -
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 17 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

G. S. Ramaswamy & Ors vs Inspector-General Of Police, Mysore on 21 January, 1964

In GS Ramaswamy v. Inspector General of Police, (1964) 6 SCR 279, a Constitution Bench of thi this Court considered the promotions of Sub Sub-Inspectors of Police under Rule 486 of the Hyderabad District Police Manual which stipulated that all officers who are promoted will be on probation for a period of two years and that they may be reverted during the aforesaid period if their work and conduct is not found satisfactory. Noting that the Rule stipulated that "promoted officers will be confirmed at the
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 79 - K N Wanchoo - Full Document

Shri Kedar Nath Bahl vs The State Of Punjab And Ors. on 2 February, 1972

(Emphasis supplied) In Kedar Nath Bahl v. State of Punjab, (1974) 3 SCC 21, the appellant was appointed to a post in the Punjab Provincial 9 of 16 ::: Downloaded on - 10-03-2026 01:55:22 ::: 10 RSA-903 of 1990 (O&M) Service Class I. The appointment letter stipulate stipulated that the period of probation shall be six months. The appellant continued on probation beyond the stipulated period of six months and was eventually reverted back to his previous post. He instituted proceedings challenging his order of reversion. The appellant appellant contended that upon the expiry of the period of probation, he was deemed to be confirmed in service. Rejecting this contention, a three judge Bench of this Court held thus:
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 34 - D G Palekar - Full Document

Municipal Corporation, Raipur vs Ashok Kumar Misra on 16 April, 1991

(Emphasis supplied) 10 of 16 ::: Downloaded on - 10-03-2026 01:55:22 ::: 11 RSA-903 of 1990 (O&M) This view is also affirmed by the judgments of th this Court in Municipal Corporation, Raipur v. Ashok Kumar Misra, 1991(2) S.C.T 452 : (1991) 3 SCC 325, Jai Kishan v. Commissioner of Police, 1995(3) S.C.T 653 : 1995 Supp (3) SCC 364, State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh Khosla, 1996(3) S.C.T 337 : (1996) 9 SCC 190 and Chief GM, State Bank of India v. Bijoy Kumar Mishra, 1997(4) S.C.T. 383 : (1997) 7 SCC 550.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 78 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Jai Kishan vs Commissioner Of Police And Anr on 10 April, 1995

(Emphasis supplied) 10 of 16 ::: Downloaded on - 10-03-2026 01:55:22 ::: 11 RSA-903 of 1990 (O&M) This view is also affirmed by the judgments of th this Court in Municipal Corporation, Raipur v. Ashok Kumar Misra, 1991(2) S.C.T 452 : (1991) 3 SCC 325, Jai Kishan v. Commissioner of Police, 1995(3) S.C.T 653 : 1995 Supp (3) SCC 364, State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh Khosla, 1996(3) S.C.T 337 : (1996) 9 SCC 190 and Chief GM, State Bank of India v. Bijoy Kumar Mishra, 1997(4) S.C.T. 383 : (1997) 7 SCC 550.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 21 - Full Document

The Chief General Manager,State Bank Of ... vs Shri Bijoy Kumar Mishra on 24 September, 1997

(Emphasis supplied) 10 of 16 ::: Downloaded on - 10-03-2026 01:55:22 ::: 11 RSA-903 of 1990 (O&M) This view is also affirmed by the judgments of th this Court in Municipal Corporation, Raipur v. Ashok Kumar Misra, 1991(2) S.C.T 452 : (1991) 3 SCC 325, Jai Kishan v. Commissioner of Police, 1995(3) S.C.T 653 : 1995 Supp (3) SCC 364, State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh Khosla, 1996(3) S.C.T 337 : (1996) 9 SCC 190 and Chief GM, State Bank of India v. Bijoy Kumar Mishra, 1997(4) S.C.T. 383 : (1997) 7 SCC 550.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 15 - Full Document

Head Master,Lawrence School,Lovedale vs Jayanthi Raghu & Anr on 16 March, 2012

37. Recently, in Head Master, Lawrence School, Lovedale v. Jayanthi Raghu, 2012(2) S.C.T. 526 : (2012) 4 SCC 793, a two judge Bench of this Court held that even where the relevant rule prescribes a maximum period of probation, the use of the words "if confirmed" denote a condition precedent and that there is no deemed confirmation of service unless a specific order of confirmation is issued. The Court held tthus:
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 54 - D Misra - Full Document

Director Aryabhatta Research ... vs Devendra Joshi . on 19 March, 2018

12. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that there should have been regular inquiry before termination of services of the appellant as the order of termination was by way of punishment and stigmatic, is not sustainable inasmuch as the services of the appellant were terminated because of his unsatisfactory work and conduct during the period of probation. It was a simple case of discharge from service of a probationer at the end of probation, who was found unfit in view of the work and conduct displayed by him during the period of probation and cannot be said to be punitive. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Director Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES) and another v. Devendra Joshi and others, 2018(2) SCT 382 whilee considering the similar situation has held as under: -
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 10 - L N Rao - Full Document
1