Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 45 (0.31 seconds)Section 7 in Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 [Entire Act]
Section 7A in Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 2 in Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Garikapatti Veeraya vs N. Subbiah Choudhury on 1 February, 1957
"22. On a proper understanding of the authority in Garikapati
Veeraya [Garikapati Veeraya v. N. Subbiah Choudhry, AIR 1957 SC 540] ,
which relied upon the Privy Council decision in Colonial Sugar Refining Co.
Ltd. [Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Ltd. v. Irving, 1905 AC 369 : (1904-07) All
ER Rep Ext 1620 (PC)] , three basic principles, namely,
22.1. The forum of appeal available to a suitor in a pending action of an
appeal to a superior tribunal which belongs to him as of right is a very different
thing from regulating procedure;
Salam Samarjeet Singh vs High Court Of Manipur At Imphal And Anr on 7 October, 2016
61. Following Sivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala,
(2024) 3 SCC 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge
Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of
Manipur [Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC
179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : (Salam Samarjeet
Singh case [Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC
179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] , SCC para 34)
"34. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be
justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case
such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the
recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of
the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as
per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate
expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and
predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India."
Sivanandan C.T. vs High Court Of Kerala on 14 November, 2017
61. Following Sivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala,
(2024) 3 SCC 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge
Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of
Manipur [Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC
179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : (Salam Samarjeet
Singh case [Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC
179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] , SCC para 34)
"34. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be
justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case
such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the
recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of
the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as
per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate
expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and
predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India."