Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (2.48 seconds)Section 224 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
Government of India Act, 1935
Section 107 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
Section 160 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
Section 159 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
The State Of Bombay vs Heman Santlal Alreja on 24 July, 1951
In a recent decision of the Bombay High Court reported in the State of Bombay v. Heman Santlal, A.I.R. 1952 Bom. 16, it was held by Chagla C.J. that the marginal notes of the Constitution may
be referred to for the purpose of understanding the drift of the Articles.
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Excess ... vs Parasram Jethanand on 9 January, 1950
The contrary view expressed in the Commr. of Income-tax Excess Profit Tax v. Parasram Jethanand, A.I.R, 1950 Mad.
Abdul Rahim Naskar vs Abdul Jabbar Naskar And Ors. on 3 February, 1950
16. Within the short period elapsing after the birth of the Constitution there have been a large number of rulings which support the view taken by me. A reference in this connection might be made to the following cases : (1) Abdur Rahim v. Abdul Jabbar, 54 Cal.
A.R. Sarin vs B.C. Patil And Anr. on 20 April, 1951
90 and (8) A.R. Sarin v. B.C. Patil, A.I.R. 1951 Bom. 423.