Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)Section 17 in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
M/S. Fair Air Engineers Pvt. Ltd.& Anr vs N.K.Modi on 20 August, 1996
The mere fact that the remedy of
arbitration, which was provided, in the Agreement dated 1.6.2007 annexure R1/3,
has already been availed of, by the Opposite Parties , that would not oust the jurisdiction of the
Consumer Fora, in view of Section 3 of the Act. Similar principle of law was laid down in Fair Engg. Pvt.
Ltd. & another Vs N.K.Modi (1996)6 SCC385 and C.C.I Chambers Coop. Housing Society
Ltd. Vs Development Credit Bank Ltd. (2003) 7 SCC233. In this view of the matter, the submission
of the Counsel for Opposite Parties No.1
& 2, being devoid of merit, must fail, and same stands rejected.
Cci Chambers Co-Op. Hsg. Society Ltd vs Development Credit Bank Ltd on 29 August, 2003
The mere fact that the remedy of
arbitration, which was provided, in the Agreement dated 1.6.2007 annexure R1/3,
has already been availed of, by the Opposite Parties , that would not oust the jurisdiction of the
Consumer Fora, in view of Section 3 of the Act. Similar principle of law was laid down in Fair Engg. Pvt.
Ltd. & another Vs N.K.Modi (1996)6 SCC385 and C.C.I Chambers Coop. Housing Society
Ltd. Vs Development Credit Bank Ltd. (2003) 7 SCC233. In this view of the matter, the submission
of the Counsel for Opposite Parties No.1
& 2, being devoid of merit, must fail, and same stands rejected.
The Consumer Protection Act, 1986
1