Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.26 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 141 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Krishnappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka By Babaleshwara P.S on 31 July, 2012
Further, at paragraph 44 of Nitya Nand (supra), the Hon'ble
Supreme Court has referred to the case of Krishnappa versus State of
Karnataka [(2012) 11 SCC 237].
Earabhadrappa Alias Krishnappa vs State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 1983
In Krishnappa v. State of Karnataka, this Court while
examining Section 149 IPC held as follows: (SCC p. 243,
paras 20-21)
"20. It is now well-settled law that the provisions of Section
149 IPC will be attracted whenever any offence committed
by any member of an unlawful assembly in prosecution of
the common object of that assembly, or when the
members of that assembly knew that offence is likely to be
committed in prosecution of that object, so that every
person, who, at the time of committing of that offence is a
member, will be also vicariously held liable and guilty of
that offence. Section 149 IPC creates a constructive or
vicarious liability of the members of the unlawful assembly
for the unlawful acts committed pursuant to the common
object by any other member of that assembly. This
principle ropes in every member of the assembly to be
guilty of an offence where that offence is committed by any
member of that assembly in prosecution of common object
of that assembly, or such members or assembly knew that
offence is likely to be committed in prosecution of that
object.
Madan Mohan Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 7 May, 1954
36. So far as the argument by the learned counsel for the
appellants that the prosecution has failed to prove any motive behind
committing murder of the deceased is concerned, now it is well settled
that when there is direct evidence, which is worth relying upon, motive
loses its significance. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Madan
versus State of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1473
while referring to various earlier judgments, has held as under: -
State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Bogam Chandraiah And Anr. on 5 August, 1986
In this
respect, we may gainfully refer to the judgment of this
Court in the case of State of Andhra Pradesh v. Bogam
Chandraiah, which reads thus: