Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.22 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 37 in Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950
Section 101 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 102 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 9A in Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Secretary To Govt., Tamil Nadu & Anr vs K.Vinayagamurthy on 26 August, 2002
In support of the aforesaid submission, reliance was placed
upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Secretary
to Government, Tamil Nadu & Anr. vs. K. Vinayagamurthy,
(AIR 2002 SC 2968); State of Kerala & Ors. vs. Unni & Anr.,
(AIR 2007 SC 819); and Kerala Samsthana Chethu
Thozhilali Union vs. State of Kerala & Ors., (AIR 2006 SC
3480), wherein it has been held that though liquor trade is a
regulated privilege, the State is duty-bound to act fairly, non-
arbitrarily and in conformity with Article 14 of the Constitution.
4.1.3. It was thus argued that the challenge raised by the
petitioners is not to any vested right in liquor trade, but to the
alleged arbitrary exercise of policy power and discriminatory
application of the Excise Policy, which squarely falls within the
scope of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India.
State Of Kerala & Ors vs Unni & Anr on 1 December, 2006
In support of the aforesaid submission, reliance was placed
upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Secretary
to Government, Tamil Nadu & Anr. vs. K. Vinayagamurthy,
(AIR 2002 SC 2968); State of Kerala & Ors. vs. Unni & Anr.,
(AIR 2007 SC 819); and Kerala Samsthana Chethu
Thozhilali Union vs. State of Kerala & Ors., (AIR 2006 SC
3480), wherein it has been held that though liquor trade is a
regulated privilege, the State is duty-bound to act fairly, non-
arbitrarily and in conformity with Article 14 of the Constitution.
4.1.3. It was thus argued that the challenge raised by the
petitioners is not to any vested right in liquor trade, but to the
alleged arbitrary exercise of policy power and discriminatory
application of the Excise Policy, which squarely falls within the
scope of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India.
Kerala Samsthana Chethu Thozhilali ... vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 24 March, 2006
In support of the aforesaid submission, reliance was placed
upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Secretary
to Government, Tamil Nadu & Anr. vs. K. Vinayagamurthy,
(AIR 2002 SC 2968); State of Kerala & Ors. vs. Unni & Anr.,
(AIR 2007 SC 819); and Kerala Samsthana Chethu
Thozhilali Union vs. State of Kerala & Ors., (AIR 2006 SC
3480), wherein it has been held that though liquor trade is a
regulated privilege, the State is duty-bound to act fairly, non-
arbitrarily and in conformity with Article 14 of the Constitution.
4.1.3. It was thus argued that the challenge raised by the
petitioners is not to any vested right in liquor trade, but to the
alleged arbitrary exercise of policy power and discriminatory
application of the Excise Policy, which squarely falls within the
scope of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India.