Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.98 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Bihar & Ors vs Shiva Bhikshuk Mishra on 14 September, 1970
On behalf of the Union of India reliance has been
placed on State of Punjab & Anr. v. Shri SukhRaj Bahadur,
Union of India & Ors. v. R.S. Dhaba, State of Bihar & Ors.
v. Shiva Bhikshiuk Mishra, R.S.
463
Sial v. The State of U.P. & Ors., State of U.P. v.
RamChandra Tridi and I.N. Saksena v. State of Madhya
Pradesh. We have gone through these decisions.
R. S. Sial vs The State Of U.P. & Ors on 25 March, 1974
On behalf of the Union of India reliance has been
placed on State of Punjab & Anr. v. Shri SukhRaj Bahadur,
Union of India & Ors. v. R.S. Dhaba, State of Bihar & Ors.
v. Shiva Bhikshiuk Mishra, R.S.
463
Sial v. The State of U.P. & Ors., State of U.P. v.
RamChandra Tridi and I.N. Saksena v. State of Madhya
Pradesh. We have gone through these decisions.
Shamsher Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 23 August, 1974
As observed by Ray, C.J. in Shamsher
Singh's case (supra) the form of the order is not decisive
as to whether the order is by way of punishment and that
even an innocuously worded order terminating the service may
in the fact and circumstances of the case establish that an
enquiry into allegations of serious and grave character of
misconduct involving stigma has been made in infraction of
the provision of Article. 311(2).
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
I N Saksena vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 January, 1976
On behalf of the Union of India reliance has been
placed on State of Punjab & Anr. v. Shri SukhRaj Bahadur,
Union of India & Ors. v. R.S. Dhaba, State of Bihar & Ors.
v. Shiva Bhikshiuk Mishra, R.S.
463
Sial v. The State of U.P. & Ors., State of U.P. v.
RamChandra Tridi and I.N. Saksena v. State of Madhya
Pradesh. We have gone through these decisions.
Union Of India, And Anr. vs R.S. Dhaba, Income-Tax Officer, ... on 7 April, 1969
On behalf of the Union of India reliance has been
placed on State of Punjab & Anr. v. Shri SukhRaj Bahadur,
Union of India & Ors. v. R.S. Dhaba, State of Bihar & Ors.
v. Shiva Bhikshiuk Mishra, R.S.
463
Sial v. The State of U.P. & Ors., State of U.P. v.
RamChandra Tridi and I.N. Saksena v. State of Madhya
Pradesh. We have gone through these decisions.
1