Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Bhaskar Lal Sharma & Anr vs Monica on 27 July, 2009
He has further pressed into service Bhaskar Lal
Sharma and another vs. Monica 2009 (3) RCR (Criminal) 866, by
the Apex Court, wherein it was observed that any gift made to the
bridegroom or his parents whether in accordance with any custom or
otherwise also would not constitute any offence under Section 406
IPC.
Rakesh Kumar Jaswal & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 28 January, 2015
Another authority referred to by learned counsel for the
petitioner in Rakesh Kumar and others vs. State of Punjab and
others 2009 (2) RCR (Criminal) 565, by a Coordinate Bench of this
Court, wherein it was observed that High Court can quash the
proceedings even after framing of charge.
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sukhdeep Kaur And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 8 October, 2015
5 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 23-07-2018 00:28:06 :::
CRM-M No. 44206 of 2015 -6-
Learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to
various authorities, first of the those being Sukhdeep Kaur and
another vs. State of Punjab and another 2015 (4) RCR (Criminal)
892, by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, wherein it was observed
that in the recent past a tendency has developed for roping in all the
relations of husband in dowry cases in order to browbeat and
pressurize the immediate family of the husband. It was further
observed that for the fault of the husband, the other relations cannot,
in all cases, be held to be involved in the demand of dowry.
Adarsh Kumar Bhambri & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 10 December, 2014
Learned counsel for the petitioners has further placed
reliance upon Smt. Adarsh and others vs. State of Punjab and
another 1992 (1) RCR (Criminal) 667, by a Coordinate Bench of this
Court, where while dealing with a case relating to an FIR under
Sections 406, 498-A IPC, relating to allegations of misappropriation
of istridhan, it was found that allegations were highly improbable and
not acceptable to common sense. The FIR was quashed qua the
petitioners holding that it is no rule of thumb that whatever has been
stated in FIR has to be accepted as gospel truth even if it is altogether
unacceptable to common sense. It was a case where the wife had
lodged FIR under Section 406 and 498-A IPC, against the entire
6 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 23-07-2018 00:28:06 :::
CRM-M No. 44206 of 2015 -7-
family members of husband without making specific mention as to
which particular article of dowry was handed over to which particular
accused. The FIR qua sister, brother and brother's wife of husband
was quashed.
1