Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.47 seconds)Section 165 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 176 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972
Section 174 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Global Energy Ltd. And Anr. vs Central Electricity Regulatory ... on 15 December, 2006
It was also argued
that the Supreme Court in Global Energy Limited vs.
Central Electricity Commission; (2009)15 SCC
570, has clarified that the rule making power for carrying
out the purpose of the act is a general delegation which
may not be used for laying down any other guidelines. By
reason of such a provision alone, the regulation making
power cannot be exercised so as to bring into existence or
affect substantive rights or obligations or disabilities
which are not contemplated in terms of the provisions of
the act.
Anita Kushwaha vs Pushap Sudan on 19 July, 2016
47. Thus, we find that the rules of 2023 along with the
amendment of 2024 are completely in consonance with
the provisions contained in Section 165, 166 and 176 of
the M.V. Act, 1988 as also the dictum of the Supreme
Court in Gohar Mohammad (supra) and Anita
Kushwaha (supra).
Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company vs Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. And Another on 10 December, 1982
In Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company vs
Bharat Cooking Coal Ltd; ( 1983) 1 SCC 147, a
five Judge Bench of the Supreme Court had held that
"scales of justice are just not designed to weigh
competing social and economic factors. In such matters,
legislative wisdom must prevail and judicial review must
abstain".