Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 31 (0.37 seconds)Section 2 in The Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 6 in The Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 53A in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Sheth Maneklal Mansukhbhai vs Messrs. Hormusji Jamshedji ... on 21 March, 1950
24. The Supreme Court has also taken the same view in the case of Maneklal Mansukhbhai v Horumsje Jamshedgi Ginwalla
and Sons, wherein it has been held that.--
Patel Natwarlal Rupji vs Shri Kondm Group Kheti Vishayak And Anr on 6 December, 1995
25. The Supreme Court, again quite recently in the case of Patel Natwarlal Rupji v Shri Kondh Group Kheti Vishayak and Another, by referring to its earlier pronouncements regarding the scope, extent and purport of Section 53A of the Act, has clearly held that the said section gives statutory right to a transferee for consideration in possession of the property under a contract and it also correspondingly imposes a bar on the transferor to recover the possession of the immoveable property
from the said transferee. It has been held by their Lordships at para 6 that:
The Vizagapatam Sugar Development ... vs T. Muthuramareddi And Ors. on 2 August, 1923
In the case of Vizagapatnam Sugar Development Company, supra, the Full Bench of the Madras High Court has held that (at page 928).--