Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.37 seconds)

Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 1 February, 1965

Since we have held in this case that there was no marriage between P.W.2 and late Subbarayalu Naidu the plaintiffs are not entitled to seek any benefits under the said provision in the Hindu Marriage Act. ' Unless it is pleaded and proved, the children out of void marriage cannot seek to gain from the provisions of Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. He also relied upon the judgment 'Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande & another vs State of Maharashtra & another reported in [CDJ 1965 SC 135]' relating to a criminal case as to what constitutes solemnization of marriage. Then again it is judgment rendered in a criminal case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 141 - R Dayal - Full Document

Priya Bala Ghosh vs Suresh Chandra Ghosh on 4 March, 1971

8. Learned counsel for the appellant relies on the judgments, 'Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande and another vs. The State of Maharashtra and another reported in [AIR 1965 supreme court 1564]' and 'Priya Bala Ghosh vs. Suresh Chandra Ghosh reported in [[1971] AIR (SC) 1153]', for the proposition as to what constitute solemnization of marriage. Both the judgments arise out of a criminal case and for the reasons aforesaid, they cannot pressed into service in this case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 117 - C A Vaidyialingam - Full Document
1   2 Next