Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)
Jagat Narain And Anr. vs Mathura Das And Ors. on 12 June, 1928 cites

Bhagwan Das Naik And Ors. vs Mahadeo Prasad Pal And Ors. on 15 February, 1923

13. We do not intend to extend this judgment to undue proportions by considering all of those cases. We propose to limit ourselves to a reference to the cases in which that theory has found expression in this Court. The first of those cases is Bhagwan Das v. Mahadeo Prasad A.I.R. 1923 All. 298. It was a judgment of Rafique, J., and Lindsay, J. That was a case of a speculative litigious suit, and it was held that such a suit was not for the benefit of the estate. With this view we think there can be no possible ground for disagreement.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Shankar Sahi And Ors. vs Baichu Ram And Ors. on 8 January, 1925

The same considerations apply to the case Shankar Sahu v. Baichu Ram A.I.R. 1925 All. 333, where their Lordships held that the litigation was in fact of the nature of a speculative litigation. Whether the particular circumstances indicate in our view that the litigation was speculative we need not consider. That was a question for determination in the particular suit and not a question of the principles to be applied.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1