Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (1.18 seconds)

J.Kathirvel vs The Inspector General Of Registration on 25 July, 2022

13. The Waqf Board, Waqf, Muthavalli or any other person, who has the management and control of the waqf property, is not entitled to alienate the same. Respondents 6 and 7 are sons of Mr.Syed Ameenudeen, who himself was the Pangali Trustee of the Waqf on the date the exchange deed was executed. When admittedly the waqf property has been exchanged after amendment to the Waqf Act inserting Sections 51 (1) (A) and 104A, all that has to be done is to apply the said provisions and declare the said document as void ab initio. I am aware that there is no provision for a registering authority to cancel a document once the process of registration is over. However, while striking down Section 77A of the Registration Act,1908, a Division Bench of this Court, in M.Kathirvel v. Inspector General of Registration, 2022 (4) CTC 769, has laid down in clear and categorical terms that this Court, in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, can declare a document to be a fraudulent one. ____________ Page 14 of 20 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/05/2025 11:51:59 am ) W.P.(MD) Nos.23489 & 23541/2024
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M Dhandapani - Full Document
1