Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.26 seconds)
The Settlement Officer vs M/S. Rahmathula Sha Mosque Durga on 23 August, 2018 cites

Dr. Natesan (Died) vs Pandari Narayanan (Died) on 14 August, 2003

8. It is the case of the Dargha/respondent that the land has been gifted to the Mosque on permanent basis and therefore the pre-existing right cannot be taken away by invoking the provisions of Tamil Nadu Inam Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963 and in support of the proposition, the decision decided on 14.08.2003 in Dr.Natesan (Died) vs. Pandari Narayanan http://www.judis.nic.in 5 (Died) in A.S.No.706 of 1985, is relied upon, wherein the relevant observation reads as under:
Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 4 - R Banumathi - Full Document

State Of Tamil Nadu Etc vs Ramalinga Samigal Madam Etc on 1 May, 1985

9. It is also contended that the property belongs to a Wakf and as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1998 (2) SCC 642 (Syed Ali & others vs. http://www.judis.nic.in 6 Andhra Pradesh Wakfboard Hyderabad & others) once a Wakf, always a Wakf, is applicable in this case also and the title to the property in favour of the Dargha cannot be disputed and the direction for grant of patta is justified. In Syed Ali's case (supra), the relevant observation reads as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 141 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document
1   2 Next