Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.32 seconds)
G. Venkati vs The State Of Telangana And 2 Others on 12 October, 2022 cites

State Of Orissa vs Dr. (Miss) Binapani Dei & Ors on 7 February, 1967

In State of West Bengal & Others Vs. Harekrishna Sardar & Anr. Reported in 2009 (4) CHN (CAL) Page 136 where the Hon'ble Division bench relying on the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision reported in AIR 1957 SC 1269 (State of Orissa Vs. Dr.Miss Binapani Dey) held that even if undertaking was given but after retirement deduction from the gratuity amount without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner when the petitioner was in service cannot be sustained since it is an administrative order which causes civil consequences. Accordingly, the Hon'ble Division Bench affirmed the Trial Court Judgment without any interference."
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 1001 - J C Shah - Full Document

D.D.Tewari (D) Thr. Lrs vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ... on 1 August, 2014

9. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgment dated 01.08.2014 in D.D.Tewari (D) through LRs Vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd., and others (2014 (9) SCALE - 78) - in case of delay in payment of pension and gratuity was pleased to award @ 9% per annum interest from the date of entitlement till the date of actual payment and, it is observed at Para 6 of the said judgment observed as follows:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 155 - V G Gowda - Full Document

The State Of West Bengal & Ors vs Sri Harekrishna Sardar & Anr on 11 May, 2009

In State of West Bengal & Others Vs. Harekrishna Sardar & Anr. Reported in 2009 (4) CHN (CAL) Page 136 where the Hon'ble Division bench relying on the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision reported in AIR 1957 SC 1269 (State of Orissa Vs. Dr.Miss Binapani Dey) held that even if undertaking was given but after retirement deduction from the gratuity amount without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner when the petitioner was in service cannot be sustained since it is an administrative order which causes civil consequences. Accordingly, the Hon'ble Division Bench affirmed the Trial Court Judgment without any interference."
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 0 - Cited by 45 - S S Nijjar - Full Document
1   2 Next