Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)Shashi Kumar Banerjee & Ors vs Subodh Kumar Banerjee Since Deceased & ... on 13 September, 1963
We may particularly refer to the decision of the Constitution Bench of this
Court in Shashi Kumar Banerjee (supra), where it was observed that the
evidence of a handwriting expert can rarely be given precedence over
substantive evidence. In the said Case, the court chose to disregard the
1
. 2019(14) SCC 220
MVR,J
S.A.No. 1524 of 2011
12
testimony of the handwriting expert as to the disputed signature of the
testator of a Will, finding such evidence to be inconclusive. The Court
instead relied on the clear testimony of the two attesting witnesses as well
as the circumstances surrounding the execution of the Will.
Murari Lal S/O Ram Singh vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 November, 1979
In Alangir v. State (NCT, Delhi) (2003) 1 SCC 21, without referring to
Section 46 of the Evidence Act this Court reiterated the observations in
Murari Lal (supra) and stressed that the Court must exercise due care and
caution while determining the creditworthiness of expert evidence."
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 45 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 47 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Chennadi Jalapathi Reddy vs Baddam Pratapa Reddy (Dead) Through ... on 27 August, 2019
In this respect, on behalf of the respondent Channadi Jalapathi
Reddy vs. Baddam Prathap Reddy (Dead) through L.Rs. &
another1 is relied on. After referring to effect of Sections 45 and 47 of
the Indian Evidence Act and earlier decisions covering this field, their
Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court observed in paras 8 to 10 as under:-
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
1