Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (2.11 seconds)Section 49 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Transfer of Property Act, 1977
Section 17 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 53A in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 116 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Singer India Ltd. vs Amita Gupta on 29 September, 2000
Inthecaseof Singer India Ltd.. Vs. Amita Gupta, 2000 VII AD
( Delhi) 1076 itwas heldthatwherethelease deed isunregistered,
it
isnotonlyunregistered,
itcan notbe saidthatitwas fora periodof9
yearsor 18 yearsinviewof Section
107 Transfer
ofProperty
Actand
has to be treated
as leasefrommonth to month.Even othersie
the
10
mandateofSection
107 TransferofProperty
Actwouldnotcome into
playsimplybecause enhancedrentwas sentand acceptedafterthe
initial
expiry
oftheleaseinas much as Section53A oftheTransfer
of
Property
Actcan notbe construed
ina manner whichwouldnegatethe
provisions
ofSection107 Transfer
ofProperty
Act.When a legislature
has intended
a particular
acttobe done ina particular
manner,ithas to
be done inthatmanner ornotatall.
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Union Bank Of India vs Sushila Goela And Ors. on 7 November, 2005
36 In the case of Union Bank of India...Vs... Sushila Goela &
others, 125 (2005) Delhi Law Times, 161 itwas heldthat where the
tenancyhas expiredby efflux
oftimeeven no noticeisnecessaryand
wherethedefendant
has notdisputed
receipt
ofnotice
and has admitted
documentsduringadmission/denial,
judgmentcanbe passedunderOrder
12 Rule 6 CPC whichbecome applicable
and thereisno questionof
holding over.
State Bank Of India vs Midland Industries And Ors. on 17 September, 1987
41 Ld.counselforthedefendant upon State Bank
has placedreliance
of India Vs... Midland Industries and others, AIR 1988 Delhi 153.
1