Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.31 seconds)Section 14 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Madamsetty Satyanarayana vs G. Yellogi Rao And Two Others on 24 November, 1964
"Waiver is an intentional relinquishment of a right. It involves
conscious abandonment of an existing legal right, advantage,
benefit, claim or privilege, which except for such a waiver, a
party could have enjoyed. In fact, it is an agreement not to
assert a right. There can be no waiver unless the person who is
said to have waived, is fully informed as to his rights and with
6
AIR 2006 SC 2571
7
AIR 1965 SC 1405
8
AIR 1935 PC 79
9
AIR 1968 SC 933
10
AIR 2012 SC 364
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 59/2021 Page 10 of 14
By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI
Signing Date:23.09.2021
10:57:03
full knowledge about the same, he intentionally abandons
them. (Vide Dawsons Bank Ltd. v. Nippon Menkwa
Kabushiki Kaisha8, Basheshar Nath v. CIT 11, Mademsetty
Satyanarayana v. G. Yelloji Rao7, Associated Hotels of India
Ltd. v. S.B. Sardar Ranjit Singh9, Jaswantsingh
Mathurasingh v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corpn. 12, Sikkim
Subba Associates v. State of Sikkim 13, and Krishna Bahadur
v. Purna Theatre 14"
Associated Hotels Of India Ltd., Delhi vs S. B. Sardar Ranjit Singh on 7 December, 1967
"Waiver is an intentional relinquishment of a right. It involves
conscious abandonment of an existing legal right, advantage,
benefit, claim or privilege, which except for such a waiver, a
party could have enjoyed. In fact, it is an agreement not to
assert a right. There can be no waiver unless the person who is
said to have waived, is fully informed as to his rights and with
6
AIR 2006 SC 2571
7
AIR 1965 SC 1405
8
AIR 1935 PC 79
9
AIR 1968 SC 933
10
AIR 2012 SC 364
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 59/2021 Page 10 of 14
By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI
Signing Date:23.09.2021
10:57:03
full knowledge about the same, he intentionally abandons
them. (Vide Dawsons Bank Ltd. v. Nippon Menkwa
Kabushiki Kaisha8, Basheshar Nath v. CIT 11, Mademsetty
Satyanarayana v. G. Yelloji Rao7, Associated Hotels of India
Ltd. v. S.B. Sardar Ranjit Singh9, Jaswantsingh
Mathurasingh v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corpn. 12, Sikkim
Subba Associates v. State of Sikkim 13, and Krishna Bahadur
v. Purna Theatre 14"
Jmc Projects India Ltd vs Indure Private Limited on 20 August, 2020
In
fact, similar contentions, including the contention regarding the
request for extension of time operate as a waiver to Section 12(5) were
advanced before this Court and narrated in JMC Projects (India) Ltd.
v. Indure Pvt. Ltd.4, as is apparent from the paragraphs extracted
hereinabove.
Dawsons Bank Limited vs Nippon Menkwa Kabushiki Kaisha (Japan ... on 21 February, 1935
"Waiver is an intentional relinquishment of a right. It involves
conscious abandonment of an existing legal right, advantage,
benefit, claim or privilege, which except for such a waiver, a
party could have enjoyed. In fact, it is an agreement not to
assert a right. There can be no waiver unless the person who is
said to have waived, is fully informed as to his rights and with
6
AIR 2006 SC 2571
7
AIR 1965 SC 1405
8
AIR 1935 PC 79
9
AIR 1968 SC 933
10
AIR 2012 SC 364
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 59/2021 Page 10 of 14
By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI
Signing Date:23.09.2021
10:57:03
full knowledge about the same, he intentionally abandons
them. (Vide Dawsons Bank Ltd. v. Nippon Menkwa
Kabushiki Kaisha8, Basheshar Nath v. CIT 11, Mademsetty
Satyanarayana v. G. Yelloji Rao7, Associated Hotels of India
Ltd. v. S.B. Sardar Ranjit Singh9, Jaswantsingh
Mathurasingh v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corpn. 12, Sikkim
Subba Associates v. State of Sikkim 13, and Krishna Bahadur
v. Purna Theatre 14"
Krishna Bahadur vs M/S Purna Theatre & Ors on 25 August, 2004
"Waiver is an intentional relinquishment of a right. It involves
conscious abandonment of an existing legal right, advantage,
benefit, claim or privilege, which except for such a waiver, a
party could have enjoyed. In fact, it is an agreement not to
assert a right. There can be no waiver unless the person who is
said to have waived, is fully informed as to his rights and with
6
AIR 2006 SC 2571
7
AIR 1965 SC 1405
8
AIR 1935 PC 79
9
AIR 1968 SC 933
10
AIR 2012 SC 364
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 59/2021 Page 10 of 14
By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI
Signing Date:23.09.2021
10:57:03
full knowledge about the same, he intentionally abandons
them. (Vide Dawsons Bank Ltd. v. Nippon Menkwa
Kabushiki Kaisha8, Basheshar Nath v. CIT 11, Mademsetty
Satyanarayana v. G. Yelloji Rao7, Associated Hotels of India
Ltd. v. S.B. Sardar Ranjit Singh9, Jaswantsingh
Mathurasingh v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corpn. 12, Sikkim
Subba Associates v. State of Sikkim 13, and Krishna Bahadur
v. Purna Theatre 14"
Joginder Singh Sodhi vs Amar Kaur on 8 October, 2004
"Waiver", held Joginder Singh Sodhi v. Amar Kaur 15, "is a
question of fact which must be expressly pleaded and clearly
proved."