cites: 946842

Banking Service Recruitment Board, ... vs V. Ramalingam And Ors. on 3 December, 1997

The jurisdiction of the court, in this behalf, is limited. The cut-off marks fixed will depend upon the importance of the subject for the post in question. It is permissible to fix different cut-off marks for different categories of candidates. [See Banking Service Recruitment Board, Madras v. V. Ramalingam and Others (1998) 8 SCC 523].

Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 15 - Full Document

Ashwani Kumar Singh vs U.P. Public Service Commission And Ors on 14 July, 2003

14. It is now a well-settled principle of law that even wait-listed candidates have no legal right to be appointed. [See Ashwani Kumar Singh v. U.P. Public Service Commission and Others (2003) 11 SCC 584 and State of Rajasthan & Ors. V. Jagdish Chopra, [2007 (10) SCALE 470].

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 137 - A Pasayat - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan & Ors vs Jagdish Chopra on 30 August, 2007

14. It is now a well-settled principle of law that even wait-listed candidates have no legal right to be appointed. [See Ashwani Kumar Singh v. U.P. Public Service Commission and Others (2003) 11 SCC 584 and State of Rajasthan & Ors. V. Jagdish Chopra, [2007 (10) SCALE 470].

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 60 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Mrs. Asha Kaul And Anr. Etc vs State Of Jammu And Kashmir And Ors on 15 April, 1993

16. In any view of the matter, the respondents appeared in a competitive examination. The posts advertised were public posts. They did not have any vested right for appointment. It is well-known that even selected candidates do not have legal right in this behalf. [See Shankarasan Dash v. Union of India - 1991 (2) SCR 567 : (1991) 3 SCC 47], Asha Kaul (Mrs.) and Another v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and Others (1993) 2 SCC 573, All India SC & ST Employees' Association and Another v. A. Arthur Jeen and Others (2001) 6 SCC 380, Food Corporation of India and Others v. Bhanu Lodh and Others (2005) 3 SCC 618].

Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 174 - B P Reddy - Full Document

All India Sc & St Employees Assn.& Anr vs A. Arthur Jeen & Ors on 12 April, 2001

16. In any view of the matter, the respondents appeared in a competitive examination. The posts advertised were public posts. They did not have any vested right for appointment. It is well-known that even selected candidates do not have legal right in this behalf. [See Shankarasan Dash v. Union of India - 1991 (2) SCR 567 : (1991) 3 SCC 47], Asha Kaul (Mrs.) and Another v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and Others (1993) 2 SCC 573, All India SC & ST Employees' Association and Another v. A. Arthur Jeen and Others (2001) 6 SCC 380, Food Corporation of India and Others v. Bhanu Lodh and Others (2005) 3 SCC 618].

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 231 - S V Patil - Full Document

Food Corporation Of India & Ors vs Bhanu Lodh & Ors on 24 February, 2005

16. In any view of the matter, the respondents appeared in a competitive examination. The posts advertised were public posts. They did not have any vested right for appointment. It is well-known that even selected candidates do not have legal right in this behalf. [See Shankarasan Dash v. Union of India - 1991 (2) SCR 567 : (1991) 3 SCC 47], Asha Kaul (Mrs.) and Another v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and Others (1993) 2 SCC 573, All India SC & ST Employees' Association and Another v. A. Arthur Jeen and Others (2001) 6 SCC 380, Food Corporation of India and Others v. Bhanu Lodh and Others (2005) 3 SCC 618].

Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 176 - Full Document

Pitta Naveen Kumar & Ors vs Raja Narasaiah Zangiti & Ors on 14 September, 2006

In Pitta Naveen Kumar and Others v. Raja Narasaiah Zangiti and Others (2006) 10 SCC 261], this Court observed :

Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 173 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Munindra Kumar And Ors. Etc vs Rajiv Govil And Ors Etc on 10 May, 1991

18. It is also well-settled that those candidates who had taken part in the selection process knowing fully well the procedure laid down therein were not entitled to question the same. [See Munindra Kumar and Others v. Rajiv Govil and Others - AIR 1991 SC 1607].

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 180 - N M Kasliwal - Full Document

Ku. Rashmi Mishra vs Madhya Pradesh Public Service ... on 19 October, 2006

[See also Rashmi Mishra v. Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission and Others 2006 (11) SCALE 5]

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 223 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Chandra Prakash Tiwari And Ors vs Shakuntala Shukla And Ors on 9 May, 2002

In Chandra Prakash Tiwari and Others v. Shakuntala Shukla and Others [(2002) 6 SCC 127], it was held :

Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 400 - U C Banerjee - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results