P.A. Inamdar & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 12 August, 2005
5. The first and the foremost fact that is required to be
noted is that it appears that there was no representation made by
the Petitioners to Respondent Nos. 5 to 8 and especially
Respondent No.5. Though in similarly situated Zilla Parishads, the
G.R. might have been implemented that does not mean that the
representation should not be made by the Petitioners. The
Petitioners themselves have annexed copy of order passed by this
Court in Writ Petition No. 13241 of 2024 (Dinesh Eknath Patil and
4 WP 10293.2025.odt 3 of 6
others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) passed on
04/12/2024, wherein it appears that present Respondent No.5 was
Respondent No.6. This Court had then directed that Respondent-
Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar shall scrutinize
the records of those Petitioners and the places at which they were
deployed for performing their duties and then decide regarding the
implementation of the Government Resolution. In fact, present
Respondent No.5 ought to have then scrutinized the record of all
the employees under the Zilla Parishad School and ought to have
taken a decision once for all for all the employees. Again it appears
that bunch of employees filed Writ Petitions bearing Nos. 8788 of
2025, 8800 of 2025, 3977 of 2025 and 6856 fo 2025 which came
to be decided by this Court on 21.07.2025. Therein also a present
Respondent No.5-Chief Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar was party
and similar directions have been given. We intend to issue similar
directions in respect of the Petitioners also, however, before that
the Petitioners should file a representation to Respondent No.5.