Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.26 seconds)Gangabhavani vs Rayapati Venkat Reddy & Ors on 4 September, 2013
26. So far as relation of PW-1 and PW-2 with deceased is concerned, they cannot be termed to be interested witnesses. They are natural and probable witnesses at the first place of occurrence. There is no infirmity in their testimony on this point. It is settled position of law that statement of these witnesses shall be seen very carefully and cautiously, as has been held by Apex Court in Gangabhavani case (supra). Prosecution evidence on the point of last seen evidence and finding of dead body within a short span of time is firm, consistent and cogent. Deceased was not seen along with any other person during that intervening period. Thus last seen theory is fully established from prosecution evidence and reliance can safely be placed on it. Since there is ocular evidence and presence of eye account witnesses at the place of occurrence is not doubtful, manner of incident stated by witnesses also fit in the case, then testimony of eye account witnesses cannot be disbelieved.
Ram Narain Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 15 July, 1975
(Vide: Ram Narain Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1975 SC 1727; State of Haryana v. Bhagirath, AIR 1999 SC 2005; Abdul Sayeed v. State of M.P., (2010) 10 SCC 259; and Rakesh v. State of M.P., (2011) 9 SCC 698).
State Of Haryana vs Bhagirath And Others on 12 May, 1999
(Vide: Ram Narain Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1975 SC 1727; State of Haryana v. Bhagirath, AIR 1999 SC 2005; Abdul Sayeed v. State of M.P., (2010) 10 SCC 259; and Rakesh v. State of M.P., (2011) 9 SCC 698).
Abdul Sayeed vs State Of M.P on 14 September, 2010
(Vide: Ram Narain Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1975 SC 1727; State of Haryana v. Bhagirath, AIR 1999 SC 2005; Abdul Sayeed v. State of M.P., (2010) 10 SCC 259; and Rakesh v. State of M.P., (2011) 9 SCC 698).
Rakesh Sharma & Ors vs State Of M.P. & Ors on 30 August, 2011
(Vide: Ram Narain Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1975 SC 1727; State of Haryana v. Bhagirath, AIR 1999 SC 2005; Abdul Sayeed v. State of M.P., (2010) 10 SCC 259; and Rakesh v. State of M.P., (2011) 9 SCC 698).
State Of U.P vs Naresh And Ors on 8 March, 2011
In State of U.P. v. Naresh, (2011) 4 SCC 324, this Court after considering a large number of its earlier judgments held:
Lal Bahadur & Ors vs State(Nct Of Delhi) on 8 April, 2013
A similar view has been re-iterated by this Court in Tehsildar Singh & Anr. v. State of U.P., AIR 1959 SC 1012; Pudhu Raja & Anr. v. State, Rep. by Inspector of Police, JT 2012 (9) SC 252; and Lal Bahadur v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2013) 4 SCC 557).
Bhagloo Lodh & Anr vs State Of U.P on 14 June, 2011
(Vide: Bhagalool Lodh & Anr. v. State of U.P., AIR 2011 SC 2292; and Dhari & Ors. v. State of U. P., AIR 2013 SC 308).
Tilak Dhari Singh vs State Of U.P. on 23 August, 2012
(Vide: Bhagalool Lodh & Anr. v. State of U.P., AIR 2011 SC 2292; and Dhari & Ors. v. State of U. P., AIR 2013 SC 308).