Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.23 seconds)

Puran, Shekhar And Anr vs Rambilas & Anr., State Of Maharashtra & ... on 3 May, 2001

The Bench while affirming the principle laid down in Puran case (supra) has observed that when irrelevant materials have been taken into consideration by the Court granting order of bail, the same makes the said order vulnerable and subject to scrutiny by the appellate Court and that no review would lie Under Section 362 of the Code. In essence, the Hon'ble Apex Court opined that if the 5 (2008) 13 SCC 584 7 order of grant of bail is perverse, the same can be set at naught only by the superior court and has left no room for a review by the same Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 498 - S N Variava - Full Document

S. Kasi vs State Through The Inspector Of Police ... on 19 June, 2020

4. Criminal Petition No.4787 of 2021 was allowed on 05.10.2021. It was recorded in the order that accused was arrested on 29.07.2021 and remanded to judicial custody on 2 30.07.2021 and he was languishing in jail for the last 96 days, as such he is entitled for statutory bail. This Court while granting bail also relied on the judgments of the Apex Court in Uday Mohanlal Acharya Vs. State of Maharastra1 and S.Kasi Vs. State2 and eventually observed in Paragraph-9 of the order that "in view of the foregoing reasons as the charge sheet is not filed within the statutory period, the petitioner is entitled for statutory bail, which is an indefeasible right of the accused as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of cases".
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 164 - A Bhushan - Full Document
1   2 Next